In Case There Was Any Doubt: Further Proof Debit Card Reform Increased Competition, Didn't Hurt Banks

In case there was any doubt about whether or not debit card reform was a good or bad thing for banks and the overall marketplace, Time.com banking writer Martha White weighed in today with this piece.

The big banks impacted by the Durbin Amendment, which cut debit card swipe fees by half, predicted doom and gloom not just for themselves but also for smaller banks and credit unions, exempted under the amendment.

It didn't happen. The Federal Reserve said it; the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank said it; the GAO said it; and the FTC said it.

Instead of doom and gloom, banks -- even the big banks -- have been promoting debit cards stronger than ever, writes White.

"After an initial retrenchment, banks now are marketing debit cards as aggressively as ever. They’re even adding back debit card rewards programs, which many had discontinued in anticipation of the hit the regulations would deliver to their bottom lines."

Banks have been promoting debit as fast, convenient and secure and encouraging debit card use for big and small purchases- from a big plasma TV to a pack of gum. (Merchants suffer but banks make out big time on small purchases, charging 24 cents a debit swipe regardless of whether it's $1 or $100.)

"Besides looking for new customers, banks are trying to get current customers to use their debit cards more frequently. “Some banks are encouraging customers to use the card for small purchases,” Susan Wolfe says. After the swipe-fee rule kicked in, certain banks adopted the 24-cent cap as an effective floor as well as a ceiling. Since they earn the same amount if you buy a cup of coffee or a TV, they make out better if their customers use debit cards for lots of transactions, no matter how small."

Banks have even reintroduced rewards programs for debit cards in hopes of boosting fee revenue with increased volume of debit card transactions.

Read the entire article here.